Professional Development
Science classrooms often feel dense with reading. Students encounter explanations, data, and arguments throughout a lesson, each introducing precise language and unfamiliar ideas that require sustained sensemaking.
Teachers know this—and many are already working intentionally to ensure that reading is more than silent seatwork or answering questions at the end of a page. Even so, reading can still feel hard. Students may struggle to make sense of complex ideas, talk may feel slow or uneven, and engagement may not look immediate or enthusiastic.
This difficulty is not a sign that something has gone wrong. Nonfiction science reading is cognitively demanding by design. It introduces precise language, abstract relationships, and ideas students are still developing the background knowledge to understand.
In KnowAtom classrooms, this moment is familiar. Teachers regularly notice students slowing their pace, lingering on particular sentences, and rereading sections that introduce new ideas or precise language. Even highly engaged students often need time to put words to what they are thinking.
This article focuses on how KnowAtom teachers respond in those moments—using shared reading, thinking routines, and discourse to help students work productively with complex ideas and prepare for concept mapping and scientific discourse without lowering expectations.
Why High-Quality Nonfiction Science Reading Requires Time and Effort
Teachers often notice that students need more time with nonfiction science text than with other kinds of reading. This is not because the text is inaccessible. It is because the ideas are doing real conceptual work.
KnowAtom nonfiction texts are designed to:
- introduce disciplinary language with precision
- provide sufficient background knowledge to support explanation-building
- describe processes and systems students cannot fully observe firsthand
Research on disciplinary literacy shows that expert readers in science read more slowly, not more quickly, when encountering conceptually dense text. They pause, reread, and integrate ideas because meaning is built through synthesis, not surface recall (Shanahan & Shanahan, 2012). From this perspective, students slowing down during nonfiction science reading is not a deficit. It is an early approximation of how scientists actually read.
When effort and pacing are understood as expected responses to conceptually rich text, teachers are more likely to respond instructionally rather than interpreting hesitation or partial understanding as disengagement.
What Engagement Often Looks Like When Students Are Thinking Carefully
In nonfiction science reading, engagement does not always look energetic or fluent. More often, it looks deliberate and effortful.
Teachers may observe students:
- rereading the same sentence to track a new idea
- offering partial explanations as they search for language
- returning to the same concept across multiple discussions or days
Learning science research consistently shows that deep engagement often involves cognitive effort, uncertainty, and revision rather than immediate confidence or ease (Bjork & Bjork, 2011). When students are working with ideas that stretch their current understanding, effortful processing is a signal that learning is underway, not a sign that instruction has failed.
For English learners, engagement may look quieter still. Students may listen closely, gesture, contribute short phrases, or rely on peers’ language while building ideas internally. Engagement can coexist with developing language and incomplete explanations.
The purpose of KnowAtom’s reading routines is not to remove effort, but to help students persist productively through it.
How Reading Helps Surface Questions Worth Investigating
In KnowAtom lessons, reading is not used to answer students’ questions. It is used to help students recognize what they do not yet fully understand.
As students encounter new explanations, representations, and precise language, they begin to notice:
- ideas that feel important but incomplete
- explanations that raise new possibilities
- connections between the phenomenon and experiences from their own lives or communities
Questions emerge during and after reading because the text introduces ideas that cannot be resolved immediately. Research on inquiry learning shows that questions are more productive when they emerge from contact with information rather than preceding it. Exposure to new ideas helps learners recognize gaps, tensions, and possibilities they could not have identified on their own (Chin & Osborne, 2008).
For this reason, questions in KnowAtom lessons follow reading rather than precede it. Reading becomes a catalyst for curiosity and investigation, not a task for retrieving answers.
Reading as a Group Sensemaking Routine, Not Independent Decoding
In many classrooms, reading is commonly structured as silent, individual work—not because teachers misunderstand engagement, but because that structure is often the easiest to manage and assess.
KnowAtom lessons intentionally use a different structure, especially when texts introduce complex ideas.
Nonfiction reading is designed as a shared sensemaking routine. Students are not expected to independently decode and comprehend dense science text as the primary access point. Instead, teachers:
- read text aloud or project it so attention stays on meaning rather than fluency
- pause frequently to surface ideas, not to check comprehension
- make thinking public through talk before asking for written responses
Research on classroom discourse shows that comprehension is stronger when students can externalize thinking through talk, gesture, and shared representations before being expected to process ideas independently (O’Connor & Michaels, 2007; Ritchhart et al., 2011). This is especially important in science, where language and concepts are tightly intertwined.
How KnowAtom Teachers Make Reading Work When It’s Intellectually Demanding
When nonfiction science reading requires careful effort, the instructional response is not to simplify the text or push students toward more independent reading. In KnowAtom classrooms, difficulty is addressed by changing how thinking is surfaced.
This is where thinking routines play a central role.
Rather than expecting students to extract meaning privately, teachers use routines that allow students to engage with ideas before, during, and around the text—often without requiring independent decoding at first.
Effective teacher moves include:
Using shared reading to externalize thinking
Teachers read aloud or display text so students can focus on ideas, systems, and relationships. The emphasis is on sensemaking, not speed or accuracy.
Pausing for thinking routines instead of comprehension checks
Rather than asking students to summarize or answer questions, teachers pause for routines such as Wows and Wonders, Notice and Wonder, or Picture Thinking. These routines invite emerging ideas and uncertainty without requiring complete language.
Treating uncertainty as an instructional signal
When students hesitate, teachers invite them to name which ideas feel important but unresolved. This keeps students cognitively engaged even when understanding is partial.
Returning to key ideas across time and modalities
Students revisit ideas through reading, discussion, investigation, modeling, and concept mapping over multiple days. Reading is not expected to “land” in a single encounter.
Using discourse and concept mapping to share the cognitive load
Students externalize thinking through talk and visual representations. Concept maps evolve as ideas are revisited, allowing understanding to grow incrementally.
These moves reflect a core principle of KnowAtom’s design: students are not meant to master complex science ideas independently on first encounter. Thinking routines exist to make intellectual effort productive rather than discouraging.
The Role of Discourse During Reading
Discourse during reading is not meant to make the experience easier. It is meant to support careful thinking.
Teachers invite talk such as:
- “Which idea here feels most important to understand?”
- “What part of this do we need to think more about?”
- “How does this connect to things we’ve seen in our world?”
The ideas students surface through discourse become the foundation for concept mapping and later scientific discourse.
What Engagement Looks Like Across Grade Bands
K–2 — Making Space for Emerging Ideas
Reading is brief and shared. Engagement looks like tentative explanations, repeated wondering, and gradual refinement through talk.
Grades 3–5 — Supporting Careful Reading and Re-reading
Engagement often looks like slower pacing and revisiting key ideas. Rereading is framed as a scientific habit, not a mistake.
Grades 6–8 — Using Reading to Refine Explanations
Engagement often looks like recognizing incomplete explanations and revising them through discourse and modeling.
Reading as Preparation for Concept Mapping and Scientific Discourse
Nonfiction reading does not need to feel effortless to be effective.
When students bring partially formed ideas, questions, and uncertainties into concept mapping and discourse, they are positioned to do authentic scientific thinking. Reading becomes preparation for sensemaking, not a hurdle to clear.
References
-
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning.
-
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science.
-
O’Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2007). When is dialogue dialogic? Taking up student ideas.
-
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making Thinking Visible.
-
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter?